Friend says:
a male client comes in to tell me that his spouse’ card is demagnitized. so I looked at it, it has a man’s name on it, so I tell him, sir, this is your card not your spouse’s
Friend says:
but then he point out to me that his spouse is a guy
LSB says:
hahahhahhahahahahhahahahah

French class was always good for a laugh. Go back to 1991, and me in the 6th grade (I think it was 1991 anyways). Mr. Nadeau, our French teacher, was making us watch small 2 minute videos and asked us to make up the resolution to them. Me and Arthur were in a group, and had a video where a little girl had gotten a stray kitten and was taking care of it when suddenly her mother walks in. Nadeau, being an asshole, gave two guys that job. Maybe he didn’t like us. It didn’t stop us from flipping the lid on his ass.

You see, in our version of the ending, Arthur was the little girl taking good care of the kitten (we used a bundled sweater as the kitten), and I was the mother. I walked in and in my only line of the play, I yelled, “Q’est ce que c’est ca! Q’est ce que c’est ca!??”. Arthur cried “Maman!” in a plaintive voice, but my inner actor cried out for vengaeance against the pup who had violated my holy rules. Mr. Nadeau, the humorless french nitwit, watched as I kicked the cat out of Arthur’s hands and started “beating” him. (For those that don’t know, Arthur is a legit tough guy and could kick my ass easily, even then). Tears ran down my daughter’s face as I educated her in the costs associated with defying maman, and made clear that I would accept no shit from anyone, let alone a little girl who takes in stray cats. It was deep on many levels; a woman whose power structure is challenged by an innocent child and resorts to violence, a traditional “male” response. This was, of course, to demonstrate that violence was a matter of power, and unrelated to sex. Entwined in this plot was the story of the daughter who was expressing her need for love through the adoption of this kitten; love which her strict evil mother would never give her. Sadly, Mr. Nadeau was incapable of understanding the deep meaning of the plot. Truly, you were the child in the class Mr. Nadeau, philistine extra-ordinare!

As the other students cheered, Mr. Nadeau (which should be french for “I have no sense of humor”) pulled us out of class, gave Arthur a D and me an F, and then told us off.

REMINDER: I make more money than you Mr. Nadeau, and I have no union to make sure I don’t get fired.

For the past 10 months, I have had the pleasure of using a Nikon FM10 camera. It was bought for a ridiculously overpriced $320 American at the beginning of the year, but regardless, I had to buy a camera and it was the cheapest SLR I could get my hands on. (That being said, the store replaced my lens when it broke after being crammed into a bag too hard, which was a great relief. )

Today, out of curiousity, I decided to take a look at the newsgroups to see what the general opinion is. Why am I not surprised?

I haven’t yet seen the new FM10 or FE10, but from what I’ve heard I can only say it is terribly sad to see the FM and FE designations on what are apparently inferior products. The FM and FE were wonderful cameras. I used the FEs and FE2s for many years, until my eyesight reached the point that autofocus was faster and more accurate than I was.

Inferior products?

During my slog through Japan, my camera didn’t choke on their over-tightened film once. It took some awesome pictures, eventhough I could barely use it properly. It took beach pictures just as well as the urban jungle. It took pictures of a rock garden as well as what might be the rock garden of a higher poewr – a snow covered mountain range.

My pictures might be faulty at times (partially my fault, partially the lack of equipment like filters), but they always conveyed what I wanted. So for what reason is the FM10 so hated?

You’re better off with an FM2. The FM10 is not REALLY made by Nikon. It’s
contracted out.

Yes, the dark secret of the FM10. While it can use Nikon lenses and other Nikon products, it isn’t a Nikon because a third party was responsible for manufacturing it and designing its Lens.

To be honest I don’t know what to think about that. But if the primary purpose of a Camera is to take pictures, shouldn’t that be the primary task? I don’t want to boast but I think I have taken some decent pics with an unmodified FM10. A lot of them are up here (and many more are to come).

The other weakness? The fact that it is made of plastic. I am not sure how that is a weakness, you’d have to be the unluckiest SOB to drop a freaking camera. Then again, if humans can destroy Chernobyl..

When I was about to come back from Japan, my FM10 did not find much time to come out of the bag. Honestly, living there for a while dulled my photographic instinct because of how boring it became. Travelling is like work over there. Fortunately I have a new job at home which allows me to go anywhere.

I can’t wait. Maybe the FM10 will come out of its box again. And maybe I can take some pictures that everyone will like..?